Skip to main content

Retrieval Practice and Elaboration... with Venn Diagrams

 

In excited support of the release of the fabulous new book ‘Organise Ideas’ from Oliver Caviglioli and David Goodwin, I am sharing some of the various ways I have used word diagrams in my own practice. I hope these posts will be of particular use to teachers of economics and business, but also more widely!

Why use Venn diagrams?

Venn diagrams are simple, quick, efficient and easy. Students can get started on comparing two things within a matter of seconds. They are ideal for clear, visual comparison and students can usually, assuming some reasonable recall of knowledge, easily identify a list of features of at least one of the things. They can then check down their list to see if each feature is also a feature of the other thing and thus decide where to write the feature on the diagram.

Why is it useful for students to make comparisons in their retrieval practice?

I often need to teach students about concepts that have a partner pair; demand and supply; free market economy and command economy; indirect tax and subsidy. These partner pairs are typically very similar, but with some opposite features. I regularly engage students in retrieval practice on the individual concepts (e.g. ‘define the term free market economy’ or ‘draw a diagram showing the effect of a subsidy’).

However, this can get a little boring after a while and, once content has been ‘rote learned’ and ‘automated’, the advantages of further simple retrieval tasks begin to diminish. Therefore, I like to introduce retrieval Venn diagram comparison tasks to challenge students to think harder about recalled concepts and to develop more connections as a form of elaboration.

The theoretical basis for this suggests that elaboration ‘multiplies the mental cues available to you for later recall and application’ (Brown et al 2014). Thus in offering this task, I am trying to encourage creation of multiple linkages within and between topics so that there are more mental ‘routes’ to get to a concept and thus increased chances of students remembering that concept. Weinstein et al (2019) also suggest that explaining similarities and differences, as part of elaborative interrogation of topics already studied, is beneficial as ‘you are making connections between old and new knowledge, making the memories easier to retrieve later’.  

How do you use Venn diagrams for retrieval practice in the classroom?

 


1.       As a warm up, I would typically provide students with a very quick and basic definition retrieval task (e.g. defining two similar concepts that I am fairly sure, from previous successful retrieval attempts, that they all know e.g. producer surplus and consumer surplus).

2.       I would then display two overlapping circles with one of the retrieved concepts labelled in each. I would provide examples of similarities and differences between the concepts and write them in the appropriate places on the diagram.

3.       Next, I would (without the initial definition retrieval this time) display two new overlapping circles with two new concepts (e.g. PED and PES). I may work through this collaboratively with the class (taking answers from students) and then…

4.       ..set further tasks with even more new concepts as individual work, or I may just skip straight to the individual work.

5.       After individual thinking time on each task, I would encourage students to verbally elaborate on the similarities and differences they have noticed and recorded in order to check, correct and give feedback as required.  

6.       Depending on the complexity of the concepts chosen, I may or may not set further rounds of individual tasks.

Where can I read more?

There are further details on the construction and use of Venn diagrams (and many other diagrams!) in Oliver and David’s book as mentioned (see details below). The book also contains a case study from Nicky Blackford on her use of a Venn diagram and advice from Kate Jones on using word diagrams in retrieval practice more generally.

Please see Kate’s three books on retrieval practice for lots more theory and practical tips on that topic too!  

 

 

References and Further Reading

Brown, P.C., Roediger, H.L., & McDaniel, M.A. (2014). Make it Stick: The Science of Successful Learning.

Caviglioli, O. & Goodwin, D. (2021). Organise Ideas: Thinking by hand, extending the mind.

Jones, K. (2019). Retrieval Practice: Research and Resources for Every Classroom.

Weinstein, Y., Sumeraki, M., & Caviglioli, O. (2019). Understanding How We Learn: A Visual Guide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is ChatGPT? And what do educators need to know about it?

After registering on the ChatGPT website you are taken to a browser page. You can type in any question you like, and you will be provided with an answer. That’s what ChatGPT offers. It is a ‘chatbot’ and it is currently operating in a free ‘research phrase’ to collect feedback from users.   Great, isn’t that what Google does? ChatGPT is not a search engine - it is text only and it won’t pull information from elsewhere on the internet. It will give you answers using only the large body of content which it has been fed, so it does not know ‘everything’ and cannot address questions about current or future events. It does converse in a more ‘human’ manner than Google though, it’s maybe best thought of as a quiet, somewhat bookish, Alexa.  Why should I care? Home Study The content provided by ChatGPT appears to be of a much higher quality and far more specific than students could typically obtain from the internet via search engines. Users can obtain everything from compositio

Back to the Future

Ensuring something happens in the future is potentially rather easier to achieve if you possess a time machine. In theory such a contraption facilitates your travel back in time to amend things that are wrong with the present before they happen, or enables you to leap forwards to tweak moments in the future for the better. However, as Marty and Doc humorously demonstrate, this isn’t always as simple as it might seem! For the rest of us non-time-machine-owning folk, our main hope for ensuring things happen in the future lies in the effectiveness of our ‘prospective memory’. As opposed to ‘retrospective memory’ (where we are trying to remember something from the past), the concept of prospective memory refers to our ability to remember something in the future. Will you remember to wish Lucy a happy birthday tomorrow morning? Will you remember to send Jack to the office at 12.20pm for their appointment? Will you put out the garden waste bin instead of the food waste bin next week? T

Subject Symmetry

Some subjects appear to be awash with books on how to teach them and writing on what constitutes a ‘good’ curriculum in terms of that subject. Wise subject leaders who are engaged in curriculum design would of course do well to read such material to help aid their thinking, as would senior leaders who are responsible for quality assurance.   But what if little or nothing appears to have been written about the teaching of or curriculum thinking in relation to a particular subject? Where does a subject leader go for inspiration? How do they know if their curriculum is any ‘good’ or how it could be improved? How might senior leaders attempt to quality assure that curriculum?  The answer is that the curriculum thinking must be done from scratch. Before any work can be started the parties involved need first to educate themselves in the underlying principles and concepts of curriculum theory. These generic principles then need to be tentatively applied to the subject. There is no other w