Skip to main content

Exploring container and path concepts to support organisation

 

In excited support of the release of the fabulous new book ‘Organise Ideas’ from Oliver Caviglioli and David Goodwin, I am sharing some of the various ways I have used word diagrams in my own practice. I hope these posts will be of particular use to teachers of economics and business, but also of use and interest more widely too!

One of the most useful ideas that David and Oliver share and describe in their book is that of the difference between 'container' and 'path' concepts* in our ways of thinking about things. These ideas have been extremely helpful to me in thinking about ways in which I organise information which I want to present in my teaching. 

Typically, when selecting a type of word diagram to organise information, the choice is usually binary; container organiser or path organiser. This post explores how thinking deeply about container and path concepts can occasionally lead to choice of a hybrid diagram that supports a particularly specific concept and purpose, and manages to convey both container and path ideas.

Introducing the Trade Blocs Staircase 

Before introducing this diagram in the classroom I explain initially that we will be learning about different types of economic cooperation and integration between countries called ‘trade blocs’. I explain that we will be learning about four different theoretical bloc types, that we will examine these from least to most integrated and that each bloc type often retains features of the previous (less integrated) bloc.   






I would show a blank staircase-shaped structure first and then add the words, explaining verbally, and progressing step-by-step (!) upwards. I add a single-ended arrow to summarise the increasing integration and cooperation. I finish adding a double-end to the arrow and discussing the fact (as Brexit shows!) that cooperation can be reduced and partial or complete separation can occur. 

Having my cake, and eating it. 

I really like this design as I need to communicate both ‘container’ and ‘path’ concepts


Not a mind map or a tree...


Students need to understand the separate features of each bloc. These could be displayed using container ‘chunk’ organisers such as a mind map or a tree diagram, using one main branch per bloc and further lines for features. However, with overlapping features across the bloc types, there would be a lot of unnecessary repetition. 


Not a Venn or a Russian doll...


Students also need to understand the distinct features of each bloc and that they typically overlap with features of other blocs. These could be displayed using container ‘compare’ organiser such as a Venn diagram, for example placing the different blocs in a sort of Russian doll type arrangement. However, this would not allow for any sense of progression from one bloc to another. 


But a staircase of blocks...


Therefore, I chose square blocks to represent the container’ content, with words and colour for each feature, and then arranged the squares into a staircase showing that trade blocs with more integrated trading arrangements would often retain the features of less closely bound blocs


The staircase concept and the double-ended arrow convey the ‘path’ idea that countries can move up or down to more or less integrated trading arrangements (most simply by moving up or down a step, and thus adding or taking away a feature). 

(The mnemonic bonus of using blocks to teach about blocs is pure serendipity!)


Supporting writing, understanding and memory


I love using this organiser as my subsequent teaching on the topic is clearly structured and efficient. 


Having used this organiser to form a shared schema, I can then teach analysis and evaluation points for each feature square, and students are then able to plan and write essays by adopting a ‘pick and mix approach, selecting from points relating to the relevant squares in the bloc they are writing about. This organiser helps students distinguish between questions on different types of bloc and helps them address them correctly. Their understanding and memory of the topic is ultimately more flexible and robust.  

Tell me more!

If you'd like to read more about container and path concepts, and organising information more generally, David and Oliver's book contains (ooh, accidentally 'container' concept reference there!) loads more on this to help you move forward (OK, I meant the 'path' metaphor that time, sorry ;-) ). Enjoy!






*If you have not heard of these before, to understand the general idea take a look at this poster which usefully illustrates some different types of word diagrams. 'Chunk' and 'compare' type diagrams typically convey container type information, whereas 'sequence' and 'cause and effect' type diagrams typically convey path type information.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Subject Symmetry

Some subjects appear to be awash with books on how to teach them and writing on what constitutes a ‘good’ curriculum in terms of that subject. Wise subject leaders who are engaged in curriculum design would of course do well to read such material to help aid their thinking, as would senior leaders who are responsible for quality assurance.   But what if little or nothing appears to have been written about the teaching of or curriculum thinking in relation to a particular subject? Where does a subject leader go for inspiration? How do they know if their curriculum is any ‘good’ or how it could be improved? How might senior leaders attempt to quality assure that curriculum?  The answer is that the curriculum thinking must be done from scratch. Before any work can be started the parties involved need first to educate themselves in the underlying principles and concepts of curriculum theory. These generic principles then need to be tentatively applied to the subject. There is no other w

What is ChatGPT? And what do educators need to know about it?

After registering on the ChatGPT website you are taken to a browser page. You can type in any question you like, and you will be provided with an answer. That’s what ChatGPT offers. It is a ‘chatbot’ and it is currently operating in a free ‘research phrase’ to collect feedback from users.   Great, isn’t that what Google does? ChatGPT is not a search engine - it is text only and it won’t pull information from elsewhere on the internet. It will give you answers using only the large body of content which it has been fed, so it does not know ‘everything’ and cannot address questions about current or future events. It does converse in a more ‘human’ manner than Google though, it’s maybe best thought of as a quiet, somewhat bookish, Alexa.  Why should I care? Home Study The content provided by ChatGPT appears to be of a much higher quality and far more specific than students could typically obtain from the internet via search engines. Users can obtain everything from compositio

Back to the Future

Ensuring something happens in the future is potentially rather easier to achieve if you possess a time machine. In theory such a contraption facilitates your travel back in time to amend things that are wrong with the present before they happen, or enables you to leap forwards to tweak moments in the future for the better. However, as Marty and Doc humorously demonstrate, this isn’t always as simple as it might seem! For the rest of us non-time-machine-owning folk, our main hope for ensuring things happen in the future lies in the effectiveness of our ‘prospective memory’. As opposed to ‘retrospective memory’ (where we are trying to remember something from the past), the concept of prospective memory refers to our ability to remember something in the future. Will you remember to wish Lucy a happy birthday tomorrow morning? Will you remember to send Jack to the office at 12.20pm for their appointment? Will you put out the garden waste bin instead of the food waste bin next week? T