Skip to main content

Diagrams.net

 I love diagrams.

I've had great fun creating a whole host of graphics in PowerPoint, Keynote and Google Slides (thanks to lots of folks out there who have given me tips on this including Luke Tayler, David Goodwin, Oliver Caviglioli and Jamie Tegerdine). You may also now be to keen to create some diagrams yourself if you have been reading David and Oliver's book, 'Organise Ideas'. 

These software packages work fine for most of my needs, but occasionally I need more functionality than these packages offer, particularly for diagrams involving lines (such as input-output type diagrams). 

This is where diagrams.net has been particularly useful.

The key reasons why you will love this software are:

- the arc 'line jumps' and rounded line style for creating tube map style diagrams 

- the super easy 'box to line' connection

- if you connect things, then move one of them, they stayed connected

- the graph paper style gridlines help you align like a pro

- the ever-expanding size of the page - need more space? Just drag your box and the page comes with you! 


How to get started

This software is web-based. It works great on a PC with browser, I've had no luck with iPad though as yet.

Access at www.diagrams.net


Create new
Name, select blank, create

Blank canvas appears!

I usually start with inserting a box from the General menu on the left


Box colour and outline can be changed on the right
Double click on the box to type. Text can be formatted on the right. 

Right click to copy and paste the box



Paste and change text in more boxes. Click on the edges of a box (glows green) to drag a line from one box to another (drag to green glow on the new box). Line can be formatted on the right. I like to increase thickness, make rounded and remove arrow ends. 

To create line jumps, select the 'arc' option in the right hand line menu before drawing a line. I haven't quite figured out every little detail with regards to how this works myself as yet, but this should get you started at least!

Enjoy!

I quite often place a final larger box (no fill, sometimes I make outline white too, it's just to indicate the boundary easily) around my finished diagram to make export nice and easy.

File, 'export as' ... whatever you like! I chose a PNG this time. Voila!






  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back to the Future

Ensuring something happens in the future is potentially rather easier to achieve if you possess a time machine. In theory such a contraption facilitates your travel back in time to amend things that are wrong with the present before they happen, or enables you to leap forwards to tweak moments in the future for the better. However, as Marty and Doc humorously demonstrate, this isn’t always as simple as it might seem! For the rest of us non-time-machine-owning folk, our main hope for ensuring things happen in the future lies in the effectiveness of our ‘prospective memory’. As opposed to ‘retrospective memory’ (where we are trying to remember something from the past), the concept of prospective memory refers to our ability to remember something in the future. Will you remember to wish Lucy a happy birthday tomorrow morning? Will you remember to send Jack to the office at 12.20pm for their appointment? Will you put out the garden waste bin instead of the food waste bin next week? T

Subject Symmetry

Some subjects appear to be awash with books on how to teach them and writing on what constitutes a ‘good’ curriculum in terms of that subject. Wise subject leaders who are engaged in curriculum design would of course do well to read such material to help aid their thinking, as would senior leaders who are responsible for quality assurance.   But what if little or nothing appears to have been written about the teaching of or curriculum thinking in relation to a particular subject? Where does a subject leader go for inspiration? How do they know if their curriculum is any ‘good’ or how it could be improved? How might senior leaders attempt to quality assure that curriculum?  The answer is that the curriculum thinking must be done from scratch. Before any work can be started the parties involved need first to educate themselves in the underlying principles and concepts of curriculum theory. These generic principles then need to be tentatively applied to the subject. There is no other w

Classifying & Addressing Misconceptions

Are there different types of misconception? Does thinking about this help us to better identify them, prevent them and address them?  I am suggesting here that misconceptions may be classified into two types: - pre-existing misconceptions - instructional phase misconceptions (or ‘miscompletions’) If the student simply does not know something, this shall not be considered a misconception, but rather an ‘incompletion’. They have a gap, and it isn’t filled with something wrong, it’s just empty!  This post is in response to a blog named ‘Misconception?’ from Ben Newmark, you can read it here ! Thanks, Ben!