Skip to main content

Intentional Interleaving in Economics Delivery & Practice

Intentional Interleaving

This post provides economics examples (from teaching UK A Level Edexcel Economics A specification) related to my 'The Shape of It' mathematics example given in my previous blog post, 'Turn over a new leaf...'. Please read that post for wider discussion and general understanding of interleaving.




Teaching Elasticity

Students of A Level economics need to understand and be able to use four types of elasticity – price elasticity of demand (PED), price elasticity of supply (PES), income elasticity of demand (YED) and cross elasticity of demand (XED). These concepts are all similar in many respects, but each is slightly different.

Previously I have taught the definition, formula, calculation, interpretation, diagrams and factors affecting PED and then provided students with practice on this sub-topic. I have then proceeded to teach PES and provided practice. This would be classed as ‘massed and blocked practice’. After PES (I am bored of the repetition by this point) I’d hack my way through XED and YED and offer some practice on those too. I’d do some practice on all four mixed up together (this would be interleaved practice), but relatively little as by this stage I’d need to move on to teaching the next few topics otherwise we’d never finish the unit! I often didn’t have a great amount of time to come back to this later on either.

Reading about interleaving (and spacing) highlighted the rather obvious (hindsight is a wonderful thing!) idea that I would probably be better to cut some of the initial blocked and massed practice in favour of more interleaved practice at the elasticity topic end point and also later on. So I have changed my approach and deliver relatively little post-sub-topic immediate practice, more interleaved practice after teaching all four sub-topics and more spaced interleaved practice by covering this again multiple times later on in the unit and the year.

The purpose of this exercise is to improve student abilities in discrimination. All PED calculations are done in essentially the same kind of way and the answers to these calculation questions are nearly always negative answers. PES, XED and YED calculations each vary slightly and answers can either nearly always be positive (PES) or be either positive or negative (XED, YED). Blocked, massed practice fails to expose students to the reality that in the exam they will be faced with an elasticity question and they must select the correct method and interpret the answer appropriately. Blocked, massed practice typically fails to guard students from the surprisingly common mistake of missing out the positive/negative sign in a PED/PES answer (they remember every time when they do their PED-only and PES-only massed practice though!) and it fails to test with rigour the fact that positive YED answers indicate the good is ‘normal’ whereas positive XED answers indicate the goods involved are ‘substitutes’ (students nearly always get the positive-normal idea right in a full set of YED questions though and the positive-substitute idea right on a full set of XED questions). Interleaved practice however gives students the opportunity to practice choosing the right approach and correct interpretation key and answer format.     

Government Intervention

I am adopting a similar approach to teaching and practice of methods of government intervention. There are 8 interventions that students must cover at AS level. Delivery of each followed by immediate practice of each (e.g. tax content, tax case study, subsidy content, subsidy debate etc.) would appear to be less effective than teaching all 8 interventions and then offering mixed practice on all 8 after this and again at spaced later points.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Back to the Future

Ensuring something happens in the future is potentially rather easier to achieve if you possess a time machine. In theory such a contraption facilitates your travel back in time to amend things that are wrong with the present before they happen, or enables you to leap forwards to tweak moments in the future for the better. However, as Marty and Doc humorously demonstrate, this isn’t always as simple as it might seem! For the rest of us non-time-machine-owning folk, our main hope for ensuring things happen in the future lies in the effectiveness of our ‘prospective memory’. As opposed to ‘retrospective memory’ (where we are trying to remember something from the past), the concept of prospective memory refers to our ability to remember something in the future. Will you remember to wish Lucy a happy birthday tomorrow morning? Will you remember to send Jack to the office at 12.20pm for their appointment? Will you put out the garden waste bin instead of the food waste bin next week? T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Subject Symmetry

Some subjects appear to be awash with books on how to teach them and writing on what constitutes a ‘good’ curriculum in terms of that subject. Wise subject leaders who are engaged in curriculum design would of course do well to read such material to help aid their thinking, as would senior leaders who are responsible for quality assurance.   But what if little or nothing appears to have been written about the teaching of or curriculum thinking in relation to a particular subject? Where does a subject leader go for inspiration? How do they know if their curriculum is any ‘good’ or how it could be improved? How might senior leaders attempt to quality assure that curriculum?  The answer is that the curriculum thinking must be done from scratch. Before any work can be started the parties involved need first to educate themselves in the underlying principles and concepts of curriculum theory. These generic principles then need to be tentatively applied to the subject. There is n...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turn over a new leaf...

“What is interleaving?”  Answering this question is rather like answering the question, “what is healthy eating?” It’s complicated. Eat Your Greens Answering that eating vegetables is likely to be healthy would be correct in the eyes of most. Propelling the cabbage soup diet? Probably not. The core and important ‘vegetables are healthy’ message can become warped when taken to an extreme. The best answers to the question involve balance and sense, but there is no single answer and interpretations vary. And so it is when understanding interleaving. The core ‘mixing up topics is useful’ message of interleaving can unfortunately become seriously contorted beyond recognition and bereft of value when applied without careful thought. Only precise understanding and delicate application appear to deliver the benefits of this interesting, research-based and valuable strategy and thus these are what I encourage you to pursue. So, let me take you on a journey. Let’s explore ...
Post a Comment
Read more